WAGging Google Scholar (and beyond!):

Localizing and Contextualizing the Web

Ross Singer

Georgia Tech Library

GUGM 2005

Enter the library (or else)

A history of collection development & access in under 3 minutes

All access is through the "Front Door"...

Enter the proxy server

This changes everything!

...except it doesn't really change anything.

Enter the problem

Maybe the front door isn't the best way in

From LibQUAL+:

via: Lorcan Dempsey's weblog On libraries, services and networks.

Lorcan Dempsey's Weblog: http://orweblog.oclc.org/

More "bad" news

From John J. Regazzi: Managing Director, Market Development, Elsevier

In a survey for this lecture, librarians and scientists were asked to name the top scientific and medical search resources that they use or are aware of. The difference is startling. Librarians named Science Direct, ISI Web of Science, and Medline, while scientists named Google, Yahoo, and PubMed (librarians also named PubMed).

via: nfais

Also in mind blowing "chart-form" (from the above)

Google changed everything. Again.

  • Google Scholar: http://scholar.google.com
  • Scirus: http://www.scirus.com
  • PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi
  • FindArticles.com: http://findarticles.com
  • Goliath: http://goliath.ecnext.com/
  • HighBeam Research: http://www.highbeam.com/library/
  • Questia: http://www.questia.com/

Google Scholar: Catalyst for Change

Firefox extension:

Google strikes back

Scholar Preferences

A simple alternative

(Latent/Embedded/Persistent) OpenURL (Autodiscovery)

WAGging

Installing the WAGger

Things still to do

WAGger vs. Scholar Preferences

 Scholar PreferencesWAG the Dog
Advantages Instantaneous response; Little requirement for users; OpenURL links definitively go to fulltext every time; Links to fulltext in citation are highlighted Not limited to Google Scholar; Tries to content/services for every citation; Ability to push more of our collections/services to user based on context
DisadvantagesLimited coverage for OpenURL; Strange requirements for libraries to join; No possibility of ILL, print, etc. for items not held in fulltext Only as accurate as the citation data; requires user to install something; requires user to activate on every target; the more targets = slower response

Conclusion